SIE (Singular isothermal ellipsoid)¶
The singular isothermal ellipsoid is a simple example of a non-spherical source.
The dimensionless projected surface-mass density is given as
where the axis ratio obeys and is a constant parameter related to the total mass (analogous to the Einstein radius ).
Remark The relationship between and the lens potential is
where is defined in Lens Potential.
Remark Note that the normalization is chosen such that the mass inside an elliptical iso-density contour for fixed is independent of the axis ratio .
Solving the Poisson equation, this gives, according to Kormann (1994) the following. \begin{aligned} \begin{split} \psi_{\xi_0,f,\theta,D_\mathrm{L}}^\textrm{SIE(R)}(R,\phi) = \frac{\xi_0}{D_\textrm{L}^2}\sqrt{\frac{f}{1-f^2}}R\cdot &\Bigg([\sin(\phi-\theta)]\cdot\sin^{-1}\left(\sqrt{1-f^2}\cdot \sin{(\phi-\theta)}\right) \\& +[\cos(\phi-\theta)]\cdot\sinh^{-1}\left(\frac{\sqrt{1-f^2}}{f}\cos(\phi-\theta)\right)\Bigg). \end{split} \end{aligned} where are the polar coordinates in the lens plane, whereas is the orientation of the ellipse. That is, the major axis of the ellipse is from the -axis, counter-clockwise. Thus should take a constant value across the image. Note the co-ordinate relation
In the following, we use the following shorthands: \begin{aligned} f’ & =\sqrt{1-f^2}, \\\\ C_0 & = \frac{\xi_0}{D_L^2} \end{aligned}
Normalisation of the Lens Potential¶
Recall from Lens Potential that the lens potential used in the Roulette formalism differs from the more standard normalisation by a factor of or . If we also mormalise , and write , we can rewrite as \begin{split} \psi_{\xi_0,f,\theta,D_\mathrm{L}}^\textrm{SIE(R)}(r,\phi) = \frac{\xi_0^2}{D_\textrm{L}^2}\sqrt{\frac{f}{1-f^2}}\cdot r\cdot &\Bigg([\sin(\phi-\theta)]\cdot\sin^{-1}\left(\sqrt{1-f^2}\cdot \sin{(\phi-\theta)}\right) \\& +[\cos(\phi-\theta)]\cdot\sinh^{-1}\left(\frac{\sqrt{1-f^2}}{f}\cos(\phi-\theta)\right)\Bigg). \end{split} Now the standard normalisation reads \begin{split} \psi_{\xi_0,f,\theta,D_\mathrm{L}}^\textrm{SIE}(r,\phi) = \sqrt{\frac{f}{1-f^2}}\cdot r\cdot &\Bigg([\sin(\phi-\theta)]\cdot\sin^{-1}\left(\sqrt{1-f^2}\cdot \sin{(\phi-\theta)}\right) \\& +[\cos(\phi-\theta)]\cdot\sinh^{-1}\left(\frac{\sqrt{1-f^2}}{f}\cos(\phi-\theta)\right)\Bigg). \end{split}
Derivation with ¶
In this section we assume , aligning the elliptical lens with the primary axis. Then becomes
In Cartesian coordinates, we get
where
The deflection is given by the gradient . We need the following basic rules.
Differentiation with respect to ¶
Firstly, we differentiate the -term \begin{aligned} \begin{split} t_1 = \frac{d}{dx} y\sin^{-1}\left(f’\cdot\frac{y}{R}\right) &= \frac{y}{\sqrt{1 - (f’\frac{y}{R})^2}}(f’y) \frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{R} \\& = \frac{y}{\sqrt{1 - (f’\frac{y}{R})^2}}(f’y) \frac{-1}{R^2} \frac{dR}{dx} \\& = \frac{y}{\sqrt{1 - (f’\frac{y}{R})^2}}(f’y) \frac{-1}{R^2} \frac{x}{R} \\& = -\frac{f’xy^2}{\sqrt{1 - (f’\frac{y}{R})^2}} \frac{1}{R^3} \\& = -\frac{f’xy^2}{R^3}\cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - (f’\frac{y}{R})^2}} \end{split} \end{aligned} Secondly, we differentiate the -term \begin{aligned} \begin{split} \frac{d}{dx} x\sinh^{-1}\left(\frac{f’}{f}\cdot\frac{x}{R}\right) &= \sinh^{-1}\left(\frac{f’}{f}\cdot\frac{x}{R}\right) + \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 + (\frac{f’}{f}\frac{x}{R})^2}}\frac{f’}{f} \cdot \frac{d}{dx}\frac{x}{R} \\& = \sinh^{-1}\left(\frac{f’}{f}\cdot\frac{x}{R}\right) + t_2 \end{split} \end{aligned} where \begin{aligned} \begin{split} t_2 &= \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 + (\frac{f’}{f}\frac{x}{R})^2}}\frac{f’}{f} \cdot \frac{d}{dx}\frac{x}{R} \\& = \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 + (\frac{f’}{f}\frac{x}{R})^2}}\frac{f’}{f} \cdot \left[ \frac{1}{R} - x\frac{1}{R^2}\frac{x}{R} \right] \\& = \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 + (\frac{f’}{f}\frac{x}{R})^2}}\frac{f’}{f} \cdot \frac{x^2+y^2 - x^2}{R^3} \\& = \frac{f’}{f}\cdot\frac{xy^2}{\sqrt{1 + (\frac{f’}{f}\frac{x}{R})^2}} \cdot \frac{1}{R^3} \\& = \frac{f’xy^2}{R^3} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{f^2 + (f’\frac{x}{R})^2}} \end{split} \end{aligned} The partial derivative of the lens potential is then
We can prove that .
It suffices to prove that where
We have
Using the fact that we get
as required. We conclude that
Differentiation with respect to ¶
The differentiation with respect to is similar and gives
Deflection for arbitrary orientation¶
For Raytrace simulation, we only require the first order derivatives. We find it easiest to calculate the deflection vector in a local co-ordinate system where , and then rotate the deflection vector to get the deflectio in the global co-ordinate system. This is derived as [Approach 1](Differentiating SIE Approach 1).
In Roulette simulation, we require higher order derivatives. The recursive formulæ for roulette amplitudes proved intractible, but the non-recursive formulæ are straight forward if higher-order partial derivatives of can be calculated.
The rotation trick which worked for first-order derivativs does not easily generalise to higher orders. We ended up using a co-ordinate substitution and chain rule differentiation. This is elaborated as [Approach 2](Differentiation of SIE).
A possible . Approach 3 would differentiate the general formula for , but believing this to be computationally intractible, we have not developed this any further.
Other properties¶
[Critical Curves for SIE](Critical Curves for SIE)
[Implementation of SIE](Implementation of SIE)